Scanner / Robinhood Chain / 0xe4f9…615d
PAIDPaid
Scanned Tue, 15 Sep 2026 23:26:13 GMT. This page re-runs the scan when it is opened, so the verdict reflects the chain as it is now, not when the link was shared.
PAIDPaidRobinhood Chainuniswap1h oldImplausible volume for pool size
4 risk signals found, 4 checks passed. Scored 53/100.
What Nebula could not verify
- No sell simulation is available on this chain — nobody has proven the token can actually be sold.
Contract analysis
read directly from the chainNo privileged functions matched in the deployed bytecode. Absence is not proof — unusual dispatch or hand-written assembly can hide one — but nothing in the standard set is present.
Holders and deployer
snapshot Tue, 15 Sep 2026 23:03:30 GMTRisk signals
worst first24h volume is 31.2x the entire pool. Volume that far above liquidity is usually bots cycling the same funds to fake activity and chart placement.
$21.2K of depth across 6 pools. Treat any position as difficult to exit.
Most rugs happen inside the first day. History is too short to mean much.
The top 10 wallets hold 30.2% of supply. Distribution last recomputed Tue, 15 Sep 2026 23:03:30 GMT.
Checks passed
Liquidity is 39.3% of market cap across 6 pools — deep enough to absorb normal selling.
The contract exposes no owner() or getOwner(), so there is no admin role to abuse.
Direct analysis of 3,248 bytes of deployed code found no ownership function, no upgrade proxy, and no mint, pause or blacklist capability. This is what a fixed-supply token with nothing hidden behind it looks like.
The full set of contract checks ran and came back clean: not a honeypot, not mintable, no hidden owner, no self-destruct, transfers cannot be paused, and ownership cannot be reclaimed.
All liquidity pairs
split liquidity is easy to misread as depthCheck another token
Paste any address on Robinhood Chain, Ethereum, Base, BNB Chain, Arbitrum or Solana.