Scanner / Robinhood Chain / 0xc0c0…c2c1
FLYBLOCKSFlyBlocks
Scanned Wed, 16 Sep 2026 05:47:03 GMT. This page re-runs the scan when it is opened, so the verdict reflects the chain as it is now, not when the link was shared.
FLYBLOCKSFlyBlocksRobinhood Chainuniswap5h oldNothing alarming found, but key checks are unavailable on this chain.
3 risk signals found, 3 checks passed. Scored 78/100.
What Nebula could not verify
- The main contract-security API returned only partial data for this token. Ownership, upgradeability and privileged functions were read from the bytecode directly, but holder distribution is unavailable here.
- GeckoTerminal rate-limited this request, so holder distribution and deployer stake were not checked on this run. Reload in a minute for the full picture.
- No sell simulation is available on this chain — nobody has proven the token can actually be sold.
Contract analysis
read directly from the chainNo privileged functions matched in the deployed bytecode. Absence is not proof — unusual dispatch or hand-written assembly can hide one — but nothing in the standard set is present.
Risk signals
worst firstMost rugs happen inside the first day. History is too short to mean much.
$39.0K of depth across 7 pools — modest, so size accordingly.
The source is unverified, so it cannot be read line by line. Nebula analysed the deployed bytecode directly instead — the contract findings below come from the code that actually runs.
Checks passed
Liquidity is 23.1% of market cap across 7 pools — deep enough to absorb normal selling.
The contract exposes no owner() or getOwner(), so there is no admin role to abuse.
Direct analysis of 3,248 bytes of deployed code found no ownership function, no upgrade proxy, and no mint, pause or blacklist capability. This is what a fixed-supply token with nothing hidden behind it looks like.
All liquidity pairs
split liquidity is easy to misread as depthCheck another token
Paste any address on Robinhood Chain, Ethereum, Base, BNB Chain, Arbitrum or Solana.