Scanner / Arc / 0xe3e3…e6f1
CINUCircled Inu
Scanned Sun, 20 Sep 2026 18:33:51 GMT. This page re-runs the scan when it is opened, so the verdict reflects the chain as it is now, not when the link was shared.
Almost no liquidity
7 risk signals found, 1 check passed. Scored 18/100.
What Nebula could not verify
- Third-party contract security data was unavailable, so tax rates are unverified. Ownership and privileged functions were read from the bytecode instead.
- No sell simulation is available on this chain — nobody has proven the token can actually be sold.
Contract analysis
read directly from the chainNo privileged functions matched in the deployed bytecode. Absence is not proof — unusual dispatch or hand-written assembly can hide one — but nothing in the standard set is present.
Holders and deployer
via GeckoTerminalThis holder snapshot is more than two days old, so it is shown for reference and is not scored against.
Risk signals
worst first$2.5K of tradeable depth across 2 pools. At this level the price is trivially manipulated and you may not be able to sell at any reasonable price.
Down -80% in the last hour. A rug or mass exit may be in progress as you read this.
Most rugs happen inside the first day. History is too short to mean much.
owner() returns 0x6bee…b05f. Any privileged function in this contract is callable by that wallet.
24h volume is 12.1x pool liquidity. Some of this is likely inorganic.
Nothing published on the pair. No team, no roadmap, nobody accountable.
This is a clone pointing at 0x1b74…e500. The target is fixed in the bytecode and cannot be repointed, so it carries no upgrade risk — the findings below come from that implementation, not from the 45-byte stub.
Checks passed
Liquidity is 100.0% of market cap across 2 pools — deep enough to absorb normal selling.
All liquidity pairs
split liquidity is easy to misread as depthCheck another token
Paste any address on Robinhood Chain, Ethereum, Base, BNB Chain, Arbitrum or Solana.