Scanner / Arc / 0xe111…9640
SolamiansSolamians
Scanned Mon, 12 Oct 2026 11:57:47 GMT. This page re-runs the scan when it is opened, so the verdict reflects the chain as it is now, not when the link was shared.
Launched under an hour ago
7 risk signals found, 1 check passed. Scored 44/100.
What Nebula could not verify
- Third-party contract security data was unavailable, so tax rates are unverified. Ownership and privileged functions were read from the bytecode instead.
- No sell simulation is available on this chain — nobody has proven the token can actually be sold.
Contract analysis
read directly from the chainNo privileged functions matched in the deployed bytecode. Absence is not proof — unusual dispatch or hand-written assembly can hide one — but nothing in the standard set is present.
Holders and deployer
via GeckoTerminalThis holder snapshot is more than two days old, so it is shown for reference and is not scored against.
@river100x/status/2109469298070892878Risk signals
worst firstThere is no trading history to judge. Nothing here has been tested by a real sell-off yet.
Up 1,253% in 24h. Buying here means buying from everyone who is now deep in profit and looking to exit.
owner() returns 0x3956…4194. Any privileged function in this contract is callable by that wallet.
459 buys against 6 sells. Almost nobody is selling, which is more often bought volume than organic demand.
$26.7K of depth across 2 pools — modest, so size accordingly.
Nothing published on the pair. No team, no roadmap, nobody accountable.
This is a clone pointing at 0x1b74…e500. The target is fixed in the bytecode and cannot be repointed, so it carries no upgrade risk — the findings below come from that implementation, not from the 45-byte stub.
Checks passed
Liquidity is 31.1% of market cap across 2 pools — deep enough to absorb normal selling.
All liquidity pairs
split liquidity is easy to misread as depthCheck another token
Paste any address on Robinhood Chain, Ethereum, Base, BNB Chain, Arbitrum or Solana.