Scanner / Arc / 0x0e76…9b69
vampvamp
Scanned Fri, 09 Oct 2026 02:37:38 GMT. This page re-runs the scan when it is opened, so the verdict reflects the chain as it is now, not when the link was shared.
Several risk factors stack up here.
8 risk signals found, 1 check passed. Scored 41/100.
What Nebula could not verify
- Third-party contract security data was unavailable, so tax rates are unverified. Ownership and privileged functions were read from the bytecode instead.
- No sell simulation is available on this chain — nobody has proven the token can actually be sold.
Contract analysis
read directly from the chainNo privileged functions matched in the deployed bytecode. Absence is not proof — unusual dispatch or hand-written assembly can hide one — but nothing in the standard set is present.
Holders and deployer
snapshot Fri, 09 Oct 2026 02:24:20 GMTRisk signals
worst firstMost rugs happen inside the first day. History is too short to mean much.
Up 3,021% in 24h. Buying here means buying from everyone who is now deep in profit and looking to exit.
owner() returns 0x8c08…7a69. Any privileged function in this contract is callable by that wallet.
512 buys against 13 sells. Almost nobody is selling, which is more often bought volume than organic demand.
The top 10 wallets hold 39.6% of supply. Distribution last recomputed Fri, 09 Oct 2026 02:24:20 GMT.
$25.2K of depth across 2 pools — modest, so size accordingly.
Nothing published on the pair. No team, no roadmap, nobody accountable.
This is a clone pointing at 0x1b74…e500. The target is fixed in the bytecode and cannot be repointed, so it carries no upgrade risk — the findings below come from that implementation, not from the 45-byte stub.
Checks passed
Liquidity is 32.6% of market cap across 2 pools — deep enough to absorb normal selling.
All liquidity pairs
split liquidity is easy to misread as depthCheck another token
Paste any address on Robinhood Chain, Ethereum, Base, BNB Chain, Arbitrum or Solana.